Legal Opinion

Rodenbiker v. L.T.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2011No. 20100329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] B.T., the father of L.T., appeals the juvenile court’s order adopting the judicial referee’s findings of fact and order committing L.T. to the care of the Division of Juvenile Services following his admissions to gross sexual imposition and ingestion of a controlled substance. We affirm, concluding that the right-to-counsel statute in North Dakota’s Uniform Juvenile Court Act protects the constitutional rights of parents and juveniles and that the judicial referee did not err when he did not notify B.T. of the collateral consequences of L.T.’s admissions.

I

[¶ 2] L.T.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kavadas v. LorenzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. SorensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MosesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Interest of M.H.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Interest of K.I.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API