Legal Opinion

City of Temple v. Fulton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 17, 1968No. 11615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Justice.

The purpose of this suit was to dis-annex 549.992 acres of land which were annexed to the City of Temple in December 1963. Appellees, plaintiffs below, were Mr. and Mrs. Roy L. Fulton, Mr. and Mrs. D. F. Smith, Ross Barnes, Jr., Mrs. D. Furl, D. Furl, Mrs. C. E. Akin, Mr. and Mrs. W. H. Hillyard, Mr. and Mrs. M. H. Hillyard, Mr. and Mrs. John A. Gilley, Jr., Mrs. J. C. Fuller, Mr. and Mrs. Wilson J. Malcik, Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Hurta and Mrs. D. C. North-mgton, who constituted a majority of the qualified voters residing in the annexed area and who owned at least 50% of its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reichelt v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Burton v. Town of SheridanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Industrial Commission v. KokelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. (1988), Missouri Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API