Legal Opinion

State v. Murry

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2013No. Docket 31,253PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} Defendant Tiakebia Murry appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence based on an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution. Following a hearing in which the motion was denied, Defendant entered a conditional no contest plea to possession of a controlled substance (cocaine), reserving the right to appeal the denial of her motion. Defendant contends that she was seized without reasonable suspicion when two police officers…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MonafoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. RameyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. SimpsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. BryantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. DiricksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API