Legal Opinion
In re Resendez
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 24, 2016No. 04-16-00521-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
On August 15, 2016, relator Eustorgio Resendez filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, seeking a writ of mandamus ordering a justice of the peace to exhume four bodies and reopen an inquest. This court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ does not enforce our…
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Katherine Tiffany v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
- In Re Matthew Thompson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
- In Re Raymond Deba v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
- Pearl Benavides and Crystal Torres v. Susanne Deiter, Guardian, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
- in Re Eustorgio Guzman Resendez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2020