Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1989No. F-86-86Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 P.2d 232 (1989)

Oren Richard HINKLE, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-86-86.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 20, 1989.

As Corrected April 5, 1989.

Scott W. Braden, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Sandra D. Howard, Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

PARKS, Vice Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Oren Richard Hinkle, was tried by jury and convicted of Oral Sodomy (21 O.S. 1981, § 886) and Attempted Rape (21 O.S. 1981, §§ 42 and 1114), in the Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF-85-536, before the Honorable Don Powers,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bussey; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API