Scott v. State

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Antonio Scott appeals his conviction on six counts of aggravated assault 1 and one count of aggravated battery, 2 challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and arguing that the trial court erred in failing to merge the aggravated assault counts and that the prosecutor acted arbitrarily in withdrawing a plea offer. Discerning no error, we affirm.

1. When reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the…