Chatman v. Millis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
The peculiar manner in which the issues presented reach this court puts them in an odd perspective for proper treatment on appellate review. As I read the complaint the allegations pertinent to the issues are stated separately. The allegations relating to defamation are stated in Paragraphs I through VI. The allegations relating to negligence (or malpractice) are as follows:
VII
Defendant at all times mentioned in the complaint was either a psychological examiner or psychologist duly licensed under the laws of the State of Arkansas, with offices in Jackson County, Arkansas, as well as White…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.