Legal Opinion

United States v. Vincent B. Walker

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 20, 1971No. 24002_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

The only issue warranting discussion in this case concerns the trial judge’s refusal to permit defense counsel to cross-examine a government witness on the daily dosage of a heroin addict.1

Appellant was convicted of two counts of federal narcotic violations based on his possession of 36 capsules of heroin. Count one was based on 26 U.S.C. § 4704 (a), which requires the government to prove that appellant knowingly purchased, dispensed or distributed heroin not in or from the original tax-stamped package. This statute permits, but does not require, the jury to infer guilt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. AstlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. McBride v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API