Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Claybourne's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 22, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Mercer Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

In this action for damages for personal injuries, arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Allen Claybourne’s administrator recovered of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company a verdict and judgment for $2,000.00. The company appeals.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: Claybourne was a section hand and had been in the company’s em*317ploy for a number of years. On tbe morning of tbe accident, which occurred in. the month of November, 1912, he and other section hands, while engaged in tamping…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Thomas' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Gail M. Connors v. Mary N. Gallick, of the Estate of James J. Gallick, Deceased, and Mary N. GallickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Missouri Pac. R.R., Thompson, Trustee v. WileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API