State v. Mullen
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Schroeder, J.:
Jordan Mullen appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Mullen claims the district court erred in that it lacked probable cause to issue the anticipatory search warrant and the trigger event allowing the anticipatoiy search warrant to be executed never occurred. We disagree. We affirm the denial of Mullen’s motion to suppress. The record is silent involving the district court’s explanation to Mullen of his right to a juiy trial and his waiver of that right. Thus, we reverse Mullen’s conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. YounkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020