In re: Felix M. Palacios
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Felix M. Palacios has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder *1315would have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
3Cited by160 opinions
- Isaac Seabrooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Kareem Sampson v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Gerald Tate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- In re: Randolph McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.