In re Cymbalta (Duloxetine) Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.
Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in the 25 actions listed on the attached Schedule A move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize those actions in the Central District of California, or, in the alternative, the Western District of Wisconsin, the Southern District of California, or the District of Oregon.1 Plaintiffs in three potential tag-along actions, two in the Eastern District of Missouri, and one in the Northern District of California, support centralization in the Central District of California. Common defendant Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) opposes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- McDowell v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Lloyds Bank PLC International Mortgage Service Loan LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Cymbalta (Duloxetine) Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
- Dunham v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Krulewich v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020