Legal Opinion
Reinhart v. Terra Nova Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from so much of the order as granted the cross *796motion of the defendant Lo Vullo Millemaci Associates, Inc. must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment thereon (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from that portion of the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The plaintiff owns a seven-acre parcel of property. Situated on this parcel is an L-shaped barn used for commercial storage in which an apartment was built in 1964. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tozzi v. Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Cannon Construction Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Morales v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000