Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Baughman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1998No. 1996-2727PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 302.] IN RE ESTATE OF BAUGHMAN. [Cite as In re Estate of Baughman,

1998-Ohio-473.] Probate—Claims against decedent’s estate not rejected by silence pursuant to R.C. 2117.11 unless creditor plainly invokes statute’s five-day response period— Minimum requirement to distinguish claims subject to rejection by silence from those claims simply pending an allowance decision by estate’s personal representative. 1. A claim against an estate is not rejected by silence pursuant to R.C. 2117.11 unless the creditor plainly invokes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Miller v. EwingOhio Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hawkes Hospital v. ColleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In re Estate of BaughmanOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farm Supply Ctr. v. Smith, 2008-Ca-13 (10-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API