Legal Opinion · Dissent
Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1976No. 5540Published
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
LEWIS, J.
Being of the opinion that the record is such that the judgment cannot be affirmed, I respectfully dissent. The principal points are reviewed under four headings.
1. The $121,000 matter; no agreement was reached on or before March 14, 1966
When the court found that as a term of the joint venture between the parties: “The sum of $121,000 [being] the value of Yee’s managerial ability and ‘know-how’ . . . shall be cred*236ited to Yee in the accounting”, this precluded the conclusion that the parties reached an agreement on or before March 14, 1966, because the quoted…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jake ROWE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.