Legal Opinion

Rosenblum v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1923No. 8 Div. 959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER!, J.

The indictment contained four counts. The first count ‘charged that the defendant did buy, receive, conceal, etc., 20 sacks of flour, of the value of $30, the personal property of Brown & Pender, a partnership, etc., knowing that it had been stolen and not having the intent to restore it to the owner.

The second count charged that defendant received the same property, knowing it had been embezzled.

The third and fourth counts charged the same offenses respectively as the first and second, except that the ownership was laid in Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, a corporation.

B…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Dozier v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spelce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Murchison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Ex Parte RosenblumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Spelce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API