Legal Opinion

M'Mahan v. Kimball

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1832PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinney, J.

The appellee declared in disseisin, claiming the possession of. a lot of ground in the town of Salem, it being a part of in-lot numbered four, with the buildings and improvements thereon, of which she was, on the — day of--, 1829, seised and- possessed in her own right, &c. as of dower as the widow of Nathaniel Kimball, deceased; — that the defendant entered thereon, and disseised her, &c. To this declaration the defendant pleaded not guilty. Verdict of guilty, and damages assessed at 75 dollars. Judgment on the verdict; and the writ of habere facias possessionem awarded.

A bill of exceptions,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Heth v. Cocke & WifeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1823

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Justices of the Inferior Court v. Griffin & West Point Plank Road Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  3. Evans v. HaefnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Rank v. HannaIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Ballew v. RolerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API