Legal Opinion

Mackey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1956No. 218-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laeamoee, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Plaintiff sues for an increase in retirement pay under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802.

Prior to entering on active duty witb tbe Army, plaintiff, in April 1942, was given a physical examination. At that time an X-ray of his chest was negative. He entered on active duty June 16, 1942. While stationed at Fort Clark, Texas, be bad a bad cold and was told that X-rays showed something on bis lungs but that this bad cleared up. Plaintiff left continental United States and reported for duty at Fort Eichardson, Alaska, in October…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holliday v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Golding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Mead v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API