Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jones v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1987No. 87-75Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I agree with the majority opinion to the extent that it finds no basis in the record for assessing sales tax on the “sales for resale.” I also agree with that part of the opinion holding that the appellant owes sales tax for three years based on the receipts which he furnished the department. However, I do not agree with extending the three year statute of limitations or in upholding the arbitrary income tax assessment.

This is a clear case of overreaching on the part of the tax collectors. The conduct of the appellant in this case should be considered in light of his perception that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ragland v. Alpha Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Ragland v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API