Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. City of Groesbeck

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1936No. 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The trial court, upon the petition of the city of Groesbeck, issued a temporary writ of injunction restraining the Continental Oil Company from polluting the city’s water supply by the discharging of salt water and other obnoxious matters into Navasota river and its tributaries. The defendant appealed.

Appellant contends that the court erred in granting the temporary injunction because there was no evidence that it had ever knowingly or negligently polluted the city’s water supply. There was evidence that for several weeks prior to the filing of the suit the water in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Pearce v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Witte v. BaudererCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. City of West Frankfort v. FullopIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Salt Flat Water Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API