Legal Opinion

Don and Irene Kueneman, John R. Kueneman, and Edmund W. And Ella M. Harrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1980No. 78-1807PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by five taxpayers from a decision of the United States Tax Court determining deficiencies in their federal income taxes for the years 1971 and 1972. During thése years, appellants Don and Irene Kueneman, John Kueneman, and Edmund and Ella Harrell reported royalty payments received from an exclusive transfer of patent rights within a specified geographical area as long-term capital gains on their federal income tax returns. The Tax Court held that this did not constitute a transfer of “all substantial rights” to the patent within the meaning of Section…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Thomas L. Fawick and Marie Fawick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Rodgers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Central Pa. Sav. Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  2. Tigers Eye Trading, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Teller v. TellerHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Brian R. Devlin v. Jerry G. Ingrum and International Integrated Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Cooper v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API