Legal Opinion

Sears v. Bayoud

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1990No. C-9506PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This is an election mandamus. The issue is whether the requirement in article V, section 2 of the Texas Constitution that a candidate for the supreme court be a lawyer for at least ten years must be satisfied by the day of the general election or by the time service in office begins.

Relator Ross Sears, a candidate in the Democratic primary for Justice, Place 2, Supreme Court of Texas, filed this petition for writ of mandamus. He is asking us to order respondent Fred Meyer, Chairman of the Republican Party of Texas, to declare Lamar McCorkle, a candidate in the Repub*249lic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanford v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Burroughs Knight v. Lyles, Co. Chm.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Thiel v. Harris County Democratic Executive CommitteeTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Westervelt v. Yates, Ch.Texas Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Finance Commission v. NorwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API