Legal Opinion

Swink v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 299 and 300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On May 16, 1919, the plaintiff, Mrs. Lillian Swink, in company with a lady friend, took passage on one of defendant’s northbound trolley cars in Sixteenth Street, Philadelphia. This car stopped at Huntingdon Street, where the ladies were directed to transfer to a car in the rear, which they did, walking in the paved cartway by a second car and entering the third. While walking close to the side of the second car, its rear emergency folding doors opened and one of them struck Mrs. Swink’s arm and hand, and this suit was brought by her and her husband for the injuries thus sustained.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. v. MacKinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Herstine v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Keator v. Scranton Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Farley v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Hayman v. Pennsylvania R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Nebel v. BurrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Zaltouski v. Scranton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Dupont v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API