Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Seattle Title Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1927No. 20188. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover a money judgment for interest, which he claims had been exacted from him by the defendant in a greater amount than the law permits. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved the court to enter a judgment in its favor. This motion was overruled. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the motion was repeated and by the court sustained. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.

The facts essential to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lukens v. HazlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Reynolds v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Britz v. KinsvaterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Kline v. RobinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Holden v. SalvadoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. Browner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API