Legal Opinion

Schondel v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1910No. 21,550PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Dekalb Circuit Court; Emmet A. Bratton, Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against George Schondel. From a judgment of conviction, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellant was indicted by a grand jury of Dekalb county, upon the charge of having violated section one of an act entitled “An act to better regulate the sale of intoxicating” liquors, etc. (Acts 1907 p. 689, §8351 Burns 1908.) The offense, as charged in the indictment, is that appellant, on March 6, 1909, at Dekalb county, Indiana, did unlawfully sell to Herman Newman, for the price 'of $1, twelve quarts of intoxicating liquor, to wit, beer; he not then and there being licensed so to do. The exceptions made by the provisos of the section in question — “that none of the provisions of this act…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Combs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Morrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. German Fire Insurance v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Scherer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Rigrish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API