Legal Opinion
Wayne v. Lederle Laboratories
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 10, 1989No. Nos. 83-0034-CV-W-O-A, 83-1200-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion filed October 25, 1988, by defendant E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., for summary judgment on the grounds plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition on November 28, 1988. On January 11,1989, Squibb filed a reply in support of the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted and summary judgment will be entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff.
I. Statement of the Case
In this products liability suit, plaintiff alleges she suffered tooth discoloration as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Renfroe v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Schnabel v. Taft Broadcasting Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Tetracycline CasesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989