Carter v. Flowers Baking Company
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Opinion of the Court
The hearing Deputy concluded that defendant's witnesses deliberately concocted a false story of a non-work related injury, and that assessment of attorney's fees per N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1 was appropriate. Plaintiff's counsel had a contingency fee agreement for one-third (1/3) of any recovery, which the Deputy Commissioner found to be reasonable per N.C.G.S. § 97-90(c) (see Finding of Fact 31), and — as the Full Commission understood his Order — he ordered defendants to pay a sum equal to that amount directly to plaintiff's counsel, in addition to compensation awarded, per N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sparks v. Mountain Breeze Restaurant & Fish House, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Troutman v. White & Simpson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Foster v. Western-Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Church v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Morris v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.