Legal Opinion

King v. Rainbolt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1973No. 45111PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice:

Appellant, Eva Mae King, instituted a quiet title and partition action and appeals from that part of the trial court’s judgment which gave the appellee, John B. Rainbolt, a lien against the property in the amount of $1,891.09.

The issue to be decided is whether Rain-bolt, who purchased a one-half interest and a life estate from his predecessor, and subsequently paid off an outstanding mortgage against the property, is entitled to a contribution from those who owned the other one-half interest in the property, including the appellant herein.

The 160-acre tract was originally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrett v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Faulkenburg v. WindorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Boggs v. BoggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. W. D. Anderson & Sons v. Samedan Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Morrison v. LauntzhiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Isenhower v. DuncanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Itt Industrial Credit Co. v. L-P Gas Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Brown v. BattCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Rush v. Appointment of a Trustee for the Purpose of Securing an Oil & Gas LeaseCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Singer v. SingerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API