Legal Opinion

Putvain v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1984No. 17207-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted Heidi F. Putvain’s petition for review of a decision of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the denial of her request for widow’s benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, A.R.S. § 23-1064. Putvain v. Industrial Commission, 140 Ariz. 153, 680 P.2d 1214 (App.1983). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5, and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must decide the following issue:

Did petitioner voluntarily abandon her husband prior to his death as defined under A.R.S. § 23-1064(A)(l)?

The facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Hanrahan's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Andrade v. AndradeArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lundy v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. White v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gibbons v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Estate of Garcia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Tracy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API