Legal Opinion

Blume v. Trunz Pork Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for trichinosis suffered by respondent herein as a result of eating fresh ham purchased from the appellant by plaintiff Blume. Plaintiff Blume cooked the ham, and respondent, a guest in her home, ate of it. Order granting respondent’s motion to set aside the verdict in favor of appellant and for a new trial reversed on the law, with costs, the motion denied, the verdict reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In this action respondent seeks to cast the appellant in damages by reason of an alleged violation of the Agriculture and Markets…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hohn v. South Shore Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Lucey v. HarstedtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API