Legal Opinion
Joe Hernandez, III v. Larry Small, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 2002No. 00-56286PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas case, we must decide whether the admission of testimony at a criminal trial in state court was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence.
I
A
The underlying convictions in this case arose from two separate incidents that took place on August 10, 1993 in El Monte, California. 1 At approximately 7:00 p.m. that evening, Joe Hernandez and his subsequent eodefendant Robert Cota, both members of the El Monte Flores gang, met at the home of fellow gang-member Arthur Lopez. Hernandez was armed…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moses v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cook v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Anthony GadsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Womack v. Del PapaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.