Legal Opinion

Titus v. Titus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1945No. Docket No. 73, Calendar No. 42,985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The amended decree appealed from makes no mention as to what educational institution Rosemary shall be compelled to attend. I do not agree that this court should attempt to dictate that she must attend a college in this State.

Under a former consent decree the defendant paid $825 per year until June 1, 1943, at about which time Rosemary became 18 years of age, graduated from high school, and desired to continue her education. No payments were made after June 1, 1943, up to the entry of the instant amended decree December 14, 1943. The record shows that the defendant has an average income in…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. McKay v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  3. Strom v. StromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Charlton v. CharltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Maitzen v. MaitzenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API