Legal Opinion
John A. Tolman Co. v. Clements
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumjjsü. Both parties bring error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
On April 2, 1889, defendants entered into a writing, which, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
“I, or either of us, hereby guarantee the payment toJTohn A. Tolman Co. of any and all moneys collected by-John L. Morrissey for account of John A. Tolman Co., and for all moneys which they may from time to time-advance to said John L. Morrissey, and any and all indebtedness now due or which may hereafter become due John A. Tolman Co., in excess of the amount due said John L. Morrissey as per agreement between said John A. Tolman Co. and said John L. Morrissey, and to accept a verified…
2Cited by2 opinions
- John A. Tolman Co. v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- John A. Tolman Co. v. ButtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903