Merchandise Presentation, Inc. v. Blumenfeld
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. *868It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchsberg.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryant v. BryantNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hall v. RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982