In re the Arbitration between Forhill Gardens, Inc. & Bevona
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The denial of a motion to reargue is nonappealable. That aspect of the motion denominated as one to renew does not set forth any new matter and in reality is one to reargue. In any event, the IAS Court correctly held that the dispute submitted to the arbitrator, whether the employee represented by respondent labor union was unjustifiably discharged by petitioners, was finally determined in respondent’s favor by an award directing petitioners to reinstate the employee "with full back pay, benefits and rights”; that this award was not rendered indefinite or nonfinal by either the arbitrator’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meisels v. UhrNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Track Artist Management v. QuigleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bevona v. Command Security ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001