Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 2, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Trespass on the Case. Heard on motion to dismiss petition for new trial, and motion denied.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.

The plaintiff, who has recovered a verdict against the defendant in the Common Pleas Division, petitions for a new trial upon the ground of erroneous rulings and inadequacy of damages.

The petition was filed in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, pursuant to Gen. Laws cap. 251, ’§ 3, and the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss it upon the alleged ground that, by the constitution of the State, the exclusive jurisdiction to grant new trials for the causes contained in the plaintiff’s petition is vested in the Supreme Court, established by the constitution; a court different from and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  2. Sharpe v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1849
  3. In re Supreme CourtSupreme Court of Florida · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. State v. ManocchioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Pitassi v. Personnel Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  4. Pitassi v. PERS'L HEARING BD. CITY OF E. PROVIDENCESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  5. Brown v. Shumpert McConaghy, Pc99-5926 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API