Codington v. Mott
New Jersey Court of Chancery
This was an application to amend the bill under circumstances which fully appear by the Chancellor’s opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Oiiak-celloe.
The bill in this cause was filed to en-
force the performance of a contract for the exchange of real estate, entered into between the complainants and Mott, one of the defendants, on the nineteenth of Juno, 1861. The bill alleges that, by the agreement, the deeds for the exchange of' the said real estate were to be delivered on or before the twenty-second day of July, 1861; that, within the time limited for the exchange of said deeds, a deed was delivered for the land to be conveyed by the complainants pursuant to the agreement, and that, for the land to be conveyed by Mott, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Verplank v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Rodgers v. RodgersNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Improved Building & Loan Ass'n v. LarkinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blum Building Co. v. IngersollNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- National Bank of Commerce v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891