McLeod v. Receveur
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Appeal to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. ' In a suit in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, wherein the Youngstown Bridge Company was complainant, and . the Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Company and others were defendants, the appellants were appointed receivers of the property of the company defendant in that bill.
Read the full summary
Appeal to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. ' In a suit in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, wherein the Youngstown Bridge Company was complainant, and . the Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Company and others were defendants, the appellants were appointed receivers of the property of the company defendant in that bill. The defendant corporation was the owner of a bridge spanning the Ohio river at or near Louisville, in the state of Kentucky, and New Albany, in the state of Indiana, with considerable property in both of such states…
1Opinion of the Court
JENKINS, Circuit Judge,
after statement of tlie facts, delivered tlie opinion of the court.
The action of the state board of equalization in the assessment of the property of the Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Company is attacked upon tlie ground that it was illegal, unfair, unjust, and inequitable; that ihe amount of property belonging to ihe company in the state of Indiana was unfairly and improperly represented to the hoard, and *458by reason of such unfair, improper, and incorrect representations the Value placed thereon was largely in excess of its fair and just valuation; that the board was led to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Tallon v. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Hart v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Peden v. Board of Review of Cass CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.