Legal Opinion
Faccini v. Cordish
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2002No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered March 5, 2002, which granted the motion of defendants City of Niagara Falls and Urban Renewal Agency of City of Niagara Falls for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the complaint against defendant City of Niagara Falls and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Argenio v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Nin v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delaney v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Avellino v. TrizecHahn Newport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Faccini v. CordishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002