Legal Opinion

State v. Delfino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. 84-1704PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnors, J.

The appellant presents a sole assignment of error as the predicate for this appeal:

“The legislature intended R.C. 2925.11 to proscribe possession of any controlled substance. The simultaneous possession of more than one controlled substance is [a] single offense. Therefore, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution bars a second trial for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, following a conviction for possession of marijuana, when the cocaine and the marijuana were simultaneously possessed by the accused.”

Appellant argues that the simultaneous possession of two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Pendleton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Howard, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County2017
  5. State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API