Legal Opinion
State v. Delfino
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1986No. 84-1704PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnors, J.
The appellant presents a sole assignment of error as the predicate for this appeal:
“The legislature intended R.C. 2925.11 to proscribe possession of any controlled substance. The simultaneous possession of more than one controlled substance is [a] single offense. Therefore, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution bars a second trial for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, following a conviction for possession of marijuana, when the cocaine and the marijuana were simultaneously possessed by the accused.”
Appellant argues that the simultaneous possession of two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Pendleton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Howard, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County2017
- State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.