Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1899Published

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. James Goggin, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This is one of three actions of covenant brought by appellants in the superior court of Cook county, against appellee, on a lease and agreement executed February 18, 1880, by appellee as party of the first part, and Alfred M. Hoyt, George L. Dunlap and others as parties of the second part. Plaintiffs recovered judgments in the superior court, which were reversed by the Appellate Court. (Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hoyt, 50 Ill. App. 583.) The cases were not remanded, and appeals were prosecuted to this court. The lease and agreement were construed and the questions involved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. HoytAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Dunlap v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API