Legal Opinion
Bristol Investment Fund, Inc. v. Carnegie International Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 2003No. 02 Civ. 8891(SAS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bristol Investment Fund Limited (“Bristol”) filed this breach of contract action against Carnegie International Corporation (“Carnegie”) on November 8, 2002. Bristol now moves for summary judgment. 1 In support of its motion, Bristol submits that there are no disputed issues of material fact, that Carnegie failed to perform as required under the terms of the contract, and that accordingly, Bristol is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In response, Carnegie argues that its performance under the contract was excused because the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Urban Communicators PCS Limited Partnership v. Gabriel Capital, LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd. v. Endeavor Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Adar Bays, LLC v. Genesys Id, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.