Legal Opinion

In re TR Labs Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 1, 2012No. MDL No. 2396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, AT & T Corporation (AT & T), Comcast Corporation, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Windstream Corporation, tw telecom, inc., and Level 3 Communications, Inc., move to centralize this litigation in the District of New Jersey.1 The motion encompasses the four actions listed on Schedule A.2 Three of those actions are pending in the District of New Jersey and one action is pending in the District of Colorado. The Panel has been notified of two additional related actions, one pending in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Oil Spill, Gulf of Mex., 4/20/2010United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Unified Messaging Solutions LLC Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API