Legal Opinion

Hill v. Almon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1932No. 8 Div. 378PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Suit by T. C. Almon, appellee, against W. H. Hill to recover damages for injuries to automobile, the property of appellee. As originally filed, the complaint consisted of two counts. Thereafter plaintiff amended his complaint by the addition of counts 3 and 4. It is averred in each of the four counts that, at the time of the injury of plaintiff’s automobile, the defendant was driving his own car and the negligence comx>lained of is directly charged to defendant. At a later date, the plaintiff further amended his complaint by adding thereto counts 5 and 6, in which counts the negligence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Nelson v. First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Freeman v. SpeegleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Curry v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Swindall v. SpeignerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Cherry v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Decatur Petroleum Haulers, Inc. v. GermanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Holcomb v. MorrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API