Legal Opinion
Randleman v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 4, 2008No. 3:06CV7049PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a class action suit for recovery of money damages against a provider of title insurance to institutions making loans to *271homeowners.1 Named plaintiffs are homeowner-borrowers who refinanced mortgages on their homes. Their lender obtained lender’s title insurance from the defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company [Fidelity].
Plaintiffs claim that the premium paid for the title insurance for the refinancing transaction exceeded the premium allowed by Ohio law, and they have been injured and wronged by defendant’s failure to charge them a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lewis v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2010
- Hoving v. Lawyers Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Cates v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- AMERIQUEST MORTG. CO. v. SchebDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008