State v. Shaw
Connecticut Superior Court
Information for a riot. Hot guilty plead. Issue to the court. Shaw was an officer, had a warrant against one Allen for lewd behayior; Allen had given out high threatenings against Shaw: Shaw took these people with him to assist him in taking of Allen; as he had constantly avoided him.
Read the full summary
Information for a riot. Hot guilty plead. Issue to the court. Shaw was an officer, had a warrant against one Allen for lewd behayior; Allen had given out high threatenings against Shaw: Shaw took these people with him to assist him in taking of Allen; as he had constantly avoided him. After making known his business, and demanding admittance into the house, being refused, he broke the door, and entered the house with two of his assistants; the others did nothing, but remained out doors.
1Opinion of the Court
A motion was made, after the evidence for the state was through, to introdiice said attendants as witnesses, against whom there was no evidence, but their going with Shaw by his command to the house. The court took time to consider of it, and was of opinion that their going with Shaw by his command, and being present when he broke said doors, under the circumstances was doing nothing that was unlawful; and they were admitted, and the defendants found not guilty, and dismissed without cost.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Accarino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Latshaw v. Territory of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1854