Legal Opinion

Birmingham v. . R.C. B.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant owns and operates a street railroad in the city of Rochester. The Erie canal intersects West Main street in that city, and at the intersection the canal is crossed by a bridge built, owned and maintained by the state, and in effect the bridge forms a continuation of the highway of West Main street. It was built under the authority of the act, Chap. 351 of the Laws of 1888, and under the direction of the superintendent of public works, upon plans and specifications drawn up and prepared by the state engineer and surveyor. Its character as a lift bridge was determined by the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elgin, Aurora & Southern Traction Co. v. HenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  2. Shepard v. Denver Tramway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. City of Richmond v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Metzler v. Rochester City & Brighton RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Richmond v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API