Legal Opinion

Hicks v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 2004No. 02-06643; A122095PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board rejecting a medical arbiter’s rating of his impairment and substituting an impairment rating resulting in a reduction in claimant’s disability award from 36 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability to 18 percent permanent partial disability. We conclude that the board erred in rejecting the medical arbiter’s rating of claimant’s impairment and reverse.

The facts are undisputed. Claimant injured his neck at work in September 2000, when he fell from a ladder. Diagnostic testing revealed that claimant suffered from a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koitzsch v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Khrul v. Foremans CleanersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hicks v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Saif Corp. v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. SAIF Corp. v. BanderasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. SAIF Corp. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Multnomah County v. ShultsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API