Legal Opinion

McCulloch v. . Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1823PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Moore. This was ati appeal from the County, to the Superior Court of Moore, in an action of debt; and on the trial in the Superior Court, the Plaintiff moved to be permitted to give a new appeal bond and other securities, in order to enable him to call on one of the securities to the original appeal bond as a witness : the Court refused to grant the motion.

Read the full summary

From Moore. This was ati appeal from the County, to the Superior Court of Moore, in an action of debt; and on the trial in the Superior Court, the Plaintiff moved to be permitted to give a new appeal bond and other securities, in order to enable him to call on one of the securities to the original appeal bond as a witness : the Court refused to grant the motion. The Plaintiff then moved that he might be permitted to deposit in the Clerk’s office, money sufficient to satisfy the costs to that time, for the purpose of releasing the security in the appeal bond, and obtaining the benefit of his…

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

I believe, in a great many instance;;, securities have been released, and others substituted in their places, in order that they might thereby become competent to give evidence in the cause, I can see no inconvenience in the case, at all, comparable to that Y.litch might be experienced from a contrary rule or practice. Much injury might accrue to a person vv ho bad, unguardedly or unfortunately, procured one to become his security, whom he might afterwards discover to he, an Important witness for him.

¶ dearly think a new trial should be granted,,

And of this opinion was tine rest…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lavender v. Pritchard's AdministratorSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1805

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API