Legal Opinion
Hoggard v. Snodgrass
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided April 5, 1989No. 05-88-01126-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINKEADE, Justice.
Fred Misko, Jr., and Paula Sweeney (referred to collectively as “Misko”) represented Relator Judith Hoggard (Hoggard), her husband, and her son in a negligence action involving an accident that injured Hoggard’s son, Jay. Before the trial court had entered judgment in that action, Misko brought a negligence suit on behalf of Jay against Jay’s mother and father, the Hog-gards. Subsequently, Misko dropped Jay’s father as a defendant. Hoggard moved to disqualify Misko, the trial court denied her motion, and Hoggard brought this petition for writ of mandamus. We conditionally…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re SchmitzTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Dal-Briar Corp. v. Baskette, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Keller Industries, Inc. v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- JK AND SUSIE L. WADLEY RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND BLOOD BANK v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.